What should your blog focus on?
People save posts but do not return to them. Explore what brings them to the content and what helps them take the next step.
Find out what people are trying to do, how they choose content and services, and what holds them back. We recruit relevant participants beyond your blog and explore their experience using Jobs to Be Done.
JTBD explores the progress someone wants to make in a particular situation.
“I save your articles.
But when I need an answer,
I can’t find them again.”
“I’m here for your experience.
I’ve seen the general advice
everywhere else.”
Illustrative quotations, not client testimonials.
People save posts but do not return to them. Explore what brings them to the content and what helps them take the next step.
People read your blog but look elsewhere for help. Reconstruct what they compare, what remains unclear and when their choice changes.
A company is launching a new service or a creator is exploring a new subject. Learn from people beyond the existing readership.
The research question determines the scope. Promotion, content production and implementation are separate activities.
Materials your team can use to discuss the evidence and decide what to try next. The learning examples show the path from an account to a proposed change.
When a need arises, which options people compare and what holds them back. Use it to reconsider topics, formats and how you explain your offer.
See the findings →Sources, observations and explanations are kept separate. Return to a passage and examine what supports a finding.
View working materials →What to try first, which assumption it tests and what result would make the team reconsider.
See the testing plan →A weekday meal may depend on total time and available ingredients. When learning a technique, the same person may prefer a detailed explanation.
Jobs to Be Done explores the progress someone wants to make in a particular situation. Reconstruct what happened, which alternatives were considered and why one fitted the circumstances.
“Twenty minutes was only the cooking time. I found out about the hour of waiting later.”
The person started preparing the meal, discovered the wait and ordered delivery.
Total time to the meal may have mattered. Tiredness could also have influenced the choice.
Show total time on the recipe card and test a choice with a real deadline.
Fictional learning example illustrating the reasoning, not a client result.
A research participant is someone selected for relevant experience and circumstances.
For a full study, we recruit beyond your blog: people who recently faced the problem or chose a product, service or source of information.
They may not know you yet. Their experience helps us understand how you could be useful to them.
Who we recruit and why →We define criteria, find people, check their experience, obtain consent and schedule interviews. We recruit research participants, not followers for your blog.
Agree the question, participants, deliverables and budget. You do not need a finished brief.
Allow roughly 3–4 weeks for recruitment and interviews after agreeing the scope. Participant availability affects timing.
Analysis takes a further 7–10 working days after the material is available. Review findings and next tests together.
For the full scope, allow approximately 5–6 weeks after agreement. This is a planning estimate; the project schedule is confirmed before work starts.
Client involvement and stage outputs →Baseline scope: recruitment, 20 interviews, analysis, a report and a discussion. The research question determines the final scope.
from US$500 · Criteria, recruitment, screening and scheduling.
from US$1,200 · Relevant participants and material from 20 interviews.
from US$500 · First assess whether the existing interviews can answer your question.
Starting prices depend on the scope. Audience availability, participant incentives and all included costs are confirmed in the quote.
Stage pricing in detail →Each stage needs an owner and a clear quality standard. The people responsible and the review process are agreed before a project begins.
Selection criteria, screening, consent and scheduling. The aim is to recruit people with relevant experience.
An interview guide and careful follow-up questions. The review distinguishes remembered events from agreement with the interviewer’s assumptions.
Comparison across accounts, alternative explanations and limitations. Each finding should be traceable to the material that supports it.
Research lead
Designs qualitative research for independent creators and editorial teams. Helps turn a broad audience question into a focused study, then connects the findings to content and service decisions. Her review pays particular attention to contrasting accounts and the limits of interpretation.
Research design · analysis · final review
Researcher and course tutor
Conducts in-depth interviews and develops practical interviewing exercises. Helps researchers reconstruct specific decisions, ask clear follow-up questions and distinguish evidence from assumptions. Leads interview practice and written feedback on the course.
Interviewing · interview guides · practice feedback
Research coordinator
Coordinates participant recruitment and research operations. Turns experience criteria into screening questions, organises interview schedules and keeps participants informed about the process. Supports clear communication and consistent handovers across project stages.
Recruitment · coordination · organisation
Practise interviewing, reviewing material and preparing a report. Explore the programme and try an open exercise.
Explore the programme →
A learning route for beginners and guidance on work samples for practitioners. You do not need to buy the course to get in touch.
Choose your next step →
Yes. What matters is the decision you need to make: about topics, formats, trust in an author or how people choose an offer. Research can support a personal blog, a channel that does not sell products or services or a company blog. Audience size alone does not determine the scope; we discuss your question first.
Jobs to Be Done explores the progress a person wants to make in a particular situation. In an interview, we reconstruct a real experience: what happened, which alternatives they considered, what shaped their choice and what got in the way. For a blog, this could involve finding an answer, learning a skill or choosing a service. Explore the method.
Analytics show actions such as views, clicks and return visits. Surveys let you compare answers to predefined questions. Interviews explore the circumstances of a particular choice, with follow-up questions that can reveal reasons you had not considered. These sources complement one another; interview findings should be compared with behaviour and other evidence.
It can inform topics and recurring formats, help you understand trust, clarify an offer or explore why people turn to other sources. We define the decision first, then choose participants and interview questions. The result is evidence to inform your choice and hypotheses you can test. Our sample reports illustrate that process.
A research participant, sometimes called a respondent, is someone whose experience is relevant to the research question. They might have recently chosen a service provider, explored a new topic or decided against a purchase. We select people by their circumstances and experience, rather than just their age, job or whether they follow your blog.
Followers already know your voice and content. To understand people who have not found you, or who chose another way to solve their problem, we need other perspectives too. For a full study, finding, screening and scheduling relevant participants is a separate stage. This is research recruitment, not a service for gaining followers.
We check whether their experience fits the research question and whether they have agreed to take part. A follower can be suitable, but following your blog is not enough on its own. We then agree which stages and any additional recruitment you need. The separate “Try AskCraft” format uses participants you invite.
The five interviews in “Try AskCraft” let you see the team at work and discuss initial observations. They do not justify conclusions about your whole audience. The starting prices for a full study are based on 20 interviews; the appropriate number depends on the question, range of experiences and groups being compared. Even 20 interviews do not provide a statistical estimate of the whole audience.
It covers finding, screening and coordinating participants, based on a project with 20 interviews. Interviewing starts at US$700 and analysis at US$500. Recruitment plus interviews starts at US$1,200; all three stages start at US$1,700. We agree the scope, expenses and any participant incentives in the estimate before starting. View stages and pricing.
Yes, the stages can be agreed separately. If you already have participants, we check their relevance to the question. If you need analysis of existing interviews, we first assess whether the material can answer it. Analysis cannot recover experiences that the conversations never explored.
Allow roughly 3–4 weeks for recruitment and interviews after agreeing the research question, followed by 7–10 working days for analysis once the materials are available. Timing depends on participant availability. We need your project context, the decision you face and agreement on the research question and selection criteria. We agree the plan and deliverables before starting.
Deliverables depend on the stages you choose. Interviews provide agreed recordings or transcripts and a descriptive summary. Analysis covers situations, goals, choice criteria, barriers, limitations and hypotheses for changes, followed by a discussion of the findings. You can use it to decide which topics, formats or offers to test next. See illustrative reports.
No. You can discuss a full study directly. “Try AskCraft”, at US$150, lets you see how the team conducts five interviews and discusses initial observations before commissioning a larger project. You invite the participants; external recruitment is not included. It introduces our approach rather than providing a complete audience strategy. Explore the trial format.
No. It helps explain choices and develop hypotheses grounded in evidence. The effect depends on the changes you implement, how you test them and other influences on your audience. A report should distinguish observations from assumptions and state its limitations. Any improvement needs separate validation through behaviour and project metrics.
Yes. The AskCraft course covers interviewing and analysis, from an interview guide and first conversation to comparing evidence and preparing a report. It is for creators, company teams, students and aspiring researchers. It includes practice, reviewed work and progression after assessment. Explore the course or try the practice exercise.
If you have experience, you can tell us about it and share work you have permission to show. Beginners can explore the learning route. Buying the course is not required to be considered and does not guarantee a job or paid practice. Participation depends on your skills and available tasks; project terms are discussed separately. Explore research careers.
Tell us about your blog, product or company. We will discuss whose experience matters and which research stages you need.
Participants, deliverables,
fees and timing agreed before we start.